Scope
One defined administrative or legal-document workflow, one responsible owner and one agreed revision or correction scenario. Use synthetic or agreed anonymised material.
E7 Ecosystem /Bring one workflow.
PILOT ENQUIRIES
Bring one workflow.
Make the next step
concrete.
Choose a bounded question, agree what a useful record looks like and evaluate it with a responsible reviewer. The first step is a short conversation about scope.
01 / E2CI DOCUMENT PILOT
One batch.
A defined set of decisions.
For a language or document-services quality lead who needs an inspectable review record for selected material decisions in a translation or AI-assisted document.
The proposed scope
- One source–target batch, one language direction and one declared use.
- Up to 10,000 source words and up to 40 named material decisions; both limits apply.
- One responsible qualified reviewer and an agreed decision inventory.
- One consolidated correction and reassessment on one revised target.
The word allowance supplies context. It does not promise word-by-word review of the entire batch or certification of the document.
The deliverables
- A scope and decision inventory with exact source and target editions.
- Complete machine findings and unresolved conditions.
- Separately attributed reviewer decisions and proposed corrections or evidence requests.
- A retained revision history and final scoped report.
- A handling-effort summary to inform the next evaluation.
Agree success before the pilot
Every selected decision has its source reference, evidence, machine finding, reviewer decision and permitted use recorded. Unresolved issues remain visible. A handoff reviewer can inspect the record, and effort can be compared with the team’s ordinary review process.
A pilot can finish with unsupported claims. Completion is not a guarantee of a passing outcome, fewer errors or faster review.
02 / E7DB + BOUNDARY WORKFLOW EVALUATION
One office workflow.
A visible evidence path.
For a document workflow owner or integration partner evaluating how sources, revisions, interpretations and review decisions could remain connected.
Deliverables
A workflow and boundary map, a scoped source-to-decision evaluation record, and an integration-gap list with next implementation and validation steps.
Evaluation criteria
Inspect whether the selected decision can be traced to its exact source and reviewer; identify what the changed source affects and which trust or deployment controls are missing.
This is an exploratory evaluation of pre-alpha work. Production integration, full Boundary conformance and legal or clinical suitability are separate milestones.
03 / BEFORE INTAKE
Agree the material and the responsibility.
Send a short enquiry
Describe the workflow and intended result. Use the email drafts on this page or write directly to Oleksandr. The website does not submit enquiries automatically.
Confirm suitability
Agree a qualified reviewer or workflow owner, permitted material handling, the processing environment, input preparation and the evaluation criteria.
Confirm terms and dates
Fee and delivery date are quoted after intake and scope agreement. These pages are an invitation to discuss a pilot; they are not a purchase or booking system.
Start with an agreed sample
Share project material only after the handling arrangements are agreed. Synthetic examples are sufficient for the first conversation.
A CONCRETE NEXT STEP
Define the question.
Keep the scope clear.
Start with the workflow, intended use and an example of a useful result. Agree the material, review responsibility and evaluation criteria before work begins.