For language and document teams
Quality leads, reviewers and operations teams handling selected material decisions in translation, post-editing or document assurance.
E7 Ecosystem /Give every review
EVIDENCE-TO-CLAIM INTEGRITY
Give every review
decision a
traceable basis.
E2CI connects selected document claims to evidence and human review. Begin with a scoped, assisted pilot for translation or AI-assisted document work.
01 / THE PROBLEM
A review decision needs a record.
A translated or AI-assisted document can look complete while the important questions remain scattered across comments, source files and email. E2CI aims to connect each selected claim to its source, evidence, review criteria and accountable human decision.
For a consequential handoff
When another person needs to understand which passages were reviewed, what remains unresolved and the use the review was intended to support.
For a bounded question
Start with named decisions and their evidence. A defined review scope makes the output inspectable and the limits explicit.
02 / THE ASSISTED WORKFLOW
From source passage to review decision.
Agree the scope
Fix the source and target editions, language direction, intended use, reviewer and selected material decisions.
Prepare the evidence
A person identifies the relevant passages, claims and evidence. The current runtime accepts structured input; document extraction and translation repair are separate work.
Run bounded checks
Produce deterministic findings, uncertainty and replayable records. The machine result remains separate from the reviewer’s linguistic or domain judgement.
Review and revise
The responsible reviewer records decisions and remaining issues. One agreed revision can be reassessed without discarding the earlier result.
03 / WHAT YOU RECEIVE
A record you can inspect and hand over.
- An agreed inventory of selected material decisions.
- Source and target references with the relevant evidence.
- Machine findings and unresolved conditions.
- Separately attributed professional review decisions.
- A revision history and final report within the agreed scope.
04 / CAPABILITY & RELIANCE
Make the limits part of the result.
Checks do not establish document truth.
The current runtime checks admission, references and declarations, with bounded English lexical modality checks. It does not establish semantic or terminology correctness, jurisdictional suitability, source authenticity or translation truth.
Context compatibility remains an indeterminate material finding under the current contract. A completed run or a reviewer’s acceptance cannot silently remove it. Qualified professional judgement and appropriate source evidence remain necessary.
The reviewer workspace is in an open development draft. This page describes a proposed assisted evaluation, rather than a generally available hosted service.
A CONCRETE NEXT STEP
Define the question.
Keep the scope clear.
Start with the workflow, intended use and an example of a useful result. Agree the material, review responsibility and evaluation criteria before work begins.